Grid Security Now!

Grid Security Now!

Michael Mabee – Author of The Civil Defense Book

Menu
  • Home
  • Library
    • Grid Security Library
      • Government Documents on Grid Security
      • OE-417 Electric Disturbance Events Database
      • CIP Violation Database
      • Database of Chinese Transformers and Equipment in the U.S. Electric Grid
      • Why Haven’t We Secured the Grid?
      • What is the Electric Grid and How is it Regulated?
      • Grid Protection Posts
      • Video (EMP and Grid Security)
    • Civil Defense Library
      • The cavalry is not coming
      • Civil Defense Posts
      • Video (Preparedness)
      • Civil Defense Checklists
  • In the Press
  • Take Action!
  • Fund The Fight!
  • About Me
    • About Michael
    • Interviews – Michael Mabee
    • Subscribe to Mike’s Blog
    • Contact Me
  • My Book
Menu

Is Edison Electric Institute Helping China Lobby For Less Grid Security?

Posted on June 4, 2019November 21, 2019 by Michael Mabee

 


Edison Electric Institute’s Members Include State Owned Chinese Companies

The Edison Electric Institute (EEI), according to their website, is the trade association that represents all U.S. investor-owned electric companies. Let’s start with Exhibit A—The Edison Electric Institute’s May 2019 member list. You will note on page 3 the names of three Chinese “members” of Edison Electric Institute:

Edison Electric Institute

  • China Southern Power Grid Co.
  • State Grid Corporation of China
  • Power Assets Holdings

China Southern Power Grid Co. and State Grid Corporation of China are owned by the government of the People’s Republic of China. Power Assets Holdings is a Hong Kong company (which China calls “Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China.”)

In other words, the government of China—the very government that has been hacking the North American electric grid for years—is a member of Edison Electric Institute.

These three Chinese companies have an obligation under the 2017 Chinese National Intelligence Law to “support, assist and cooperate with the state intelligence work.” Moreover, under China’s 2014 Counter-Espionage Law a company may not refuse the Chinese government when asked for information. In fact, according Dr. Murray Scot Tanner’s Lawfare Institute analysis:

“The Intelligence Law, by contrast, repeatedly obliges individuals, organizations, and institutions to assist Public Security and State Security officials in carrying out a wide array of ‘intelligence’ work. Article Seven stipulates that ‘any organization or citizen shall support, assist, and cooperate with state intelligence work according to law.’ Article 14, in turn, grants intelligence agencies authority to insist on this support: ‘state intelligence work organs, when legally carrying forth intelligence work, may demand that concerned organs, organizations, or citizens provide needed support, assistance, and cooperation.’ Organizations and citizens must also protect the secrecy of ‘any state intelligence work secrets of which they are aware’.”

Edison Electric Institite
Photo Source: Edison Electric Institute

So, at least three members of the Edison Electric Institute have an obligation to provide information and assistance to the government of the People’s Republic of China.

Chinese companies have been “affiliates” of EEI since at least 2014 and State Grid Corporation of China has been a member of EEI since at least 2016. (Click HERE for EEI’s February 2016 Member List.) The relationship seems far from casual: In June of 2018 EEI awarded State Grid Corporation of China “Edison Electric Institute’s (EEI’s) 2018 International Edison Award.” And, EEI and the China Electricity Council (whose “President Member” is the State Grid Corporation of China) have even entered into a formal “memorandum of understanding.”

Yet, somehow the Edison Electric Institute (with its communist Chinese members) lobbies on security measures for the North American electric grid—an activity with clear U.S. national security implications.

Why is America allowing this to happen?

Edison Electric Institute Lobbies on Behalf of Its Members—Which Includes the Chinese Government

Edison Electric Institute
Source: Center for Responsive Politics

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, in 2018 Edison Electric Institute made $455,000 in political donations to members of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate (see the breakdown of who got what HERE).

In fact, Edison Electric Institute—a lobbying group whose dues-paying members include government-owned Chinese companies—contributed $795,000 into our political process in 2018 in political contributions alone. In addition to the contributions, EEI had total lobbying expenditures of $8,109,166 in 2018. While it may be flattering to think that the People’s Republic of China cares so deeply about the American political process, there is a big problem: Edison Electric Institute has taken lobbying positions opposing stronger security for the North American Electric Grid. Would we allow the government of China to fund attempts to thwart stronger security for North American Electric Grid? 

Uhhhh…looks like we did.

Edison Electric Institute Obstructs Grid Cybersecurity

EEI has fought efforts to increase the grid’s cybersecurity protections. When looking at an EEI position, what we have found useful in our analysis  is asking the question “what would China do?”

For example, in FERC Docket RM17-13-000 The Edison Electric Institute in their filing:

  • Objected to FERC’s proposal to shorten the implementation period for the new cybersecurity supply chain risk management requirements.
  • Objected to FERC’s proposal that the new Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standards apply to Electronic Access Control or Monitoring Systems (“EACMS”)

Another example is FERC Docket RM18-2-000 in which Edison Electric Institute in their filing:

  • Opposed Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standard modifications to address malware detection, mitigation, and removal.
  • Opposed more stringent Cyber Security Incident reporting.
  • Opposed adding “attempted compromise” to the cybersecurity reporting system.
  • Opposed further threat information sharing with additional federal agencies.

It is well known that malware presents a threat to the elecrtic grid as well as other critical infrastructures. As Admiral Mike Rogers (then commander of the U.S. Cyber Command and director of the National Security Agency) testified in 2014:

“There has been a lot of talk over the years about hypothetical dangers of a cyber Pearl Harbor, and it’s certainly become a bit of a cliché in cybersecurity circles. I would argue, however, that the threat of a catastrophic and damaging cyberattack in the United States critical infrastructure like our power or financial networks is actually becoming less hypothetical every day.”

But you read that correctly. The Edison Electric Institute opposes stronger grid security standards, including standards for malware detection, mitigation and removal standards for the electric grid. What would China do?

Exactly.

EEI and Friends Have Engaged in a Soviet Style Disinformation Campaign on EMP

Edison Electric InstituteThe Edison Electric Institute long cautioned us—as well as Congress and regulators—that we should not act on the existential threat of electromagnetic pulse (EMP), but should instead wait for the fabled Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report. In fact, this dangerous attitude is exemplified by the testimony of Scott Aaronson, Vice President for Security and Preparedness at the Edison Electric Institute. Regarding the threat of EMP he actually said the following in open hearing:

“But sound policy must be based on sound science. And it is for that reason that we appreciate the work of Electric Power Research Institute and North American Electric Reliability Corporation which informs industry as we pursue the right investments and operating posture to appropriately protect the energy grid.”

(February 27, 2019,  U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs, Hearing: “Perspectives on Protecting the Electric Grid from an Electromagnetic Pulse or Geomagnetic Disturbance.“)

Mr. Aaronson, did you actually just use the phrase “sound science” in the same sentence as “Electric Power Research Institute”? Well, we guess EPRI would be cutting edge state policy “science” in the People’s Republic of China. More importantly, EEI here is trying to lobby for a position of further study of the EMP problem, rather than taking action—action being the position which Senator Ron Johnson clearly favors. Thus, an example of EEI lobbying Congress on a national security issue.

In April, the EPRI report finally came out and, as expected, severely downplays the threat of EMP. Read our analysis HERE.

Moreover, EEI and EPRI have together engaged in a Soviet style disinformation campaign in an attempt to downplay threats to the electric grid, specifically EMP.

  • EPRI announced its conclusion that EMP was not a threat to the grid at the beginning of their study period and then conducted the study to support their conclusion. On December 19, 2017 EPRI issued a press release downplaying the EMP threat. This was at the start of their “EMP study.” The “report” issued in April of 2019 mirrored EPRI’s early conclusion.
  • In a paper dated February 2015, EEI made a number of representations about the phenomenon of electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and its implications for the grid that were dangerously misleading. In the interest of correcting what EEI characterizes as “myths and facts,” the Secure the Grid Coalition—a group of scientists, engineers, national security practitioners, legislators and other leaders in this field—offered a detailed and fact-checked rebuttal: Read it HERE. Interestingly, since the Secure the Grid Coalition published it’s “fact check” rebuttal to EEI’s misinformation, EEI has since scrubbed their document from their website.  Fear not, we have included the original document here: Misleading EEI Document.

What would China (or the former Soviet Union) do?

Exactly.

EEI Is Fighting Efforts to Bring Transparency to NERC’s Regulatory Scheme

Now turning to the great Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standard coverup that the Secure The Grid Coalition has been investigating for over a year. Oddly enough, EEI has entered the fight arguing that the names of companies that violate Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standards should be withheld from the public in every case, forever! 

Can you even think of a country where something like that even happens? A country where its people are kept in the dark about threats? A country where its people are fed a constant stream of misinformation?

Oh yeah. The People’s Republic of China.

Conclusion

Is most everything that the Edison Electric Institute has done to thwart efforts to protect the grid consistent with the question: “What would China do?” It sure appears that way.

If you are a Senator or Representative who has ever taken money from the Edison Electric Institute—whose membership includes (since at least 2016) the government of the People’s Republic of China—you should give the money back immediately. Not sure if you did? Here’s the list from 2018 (Information from The Center for Responsive Politics):

 

House
Total to Democrats: $123,500
Total to Republicans: $229,000
Recipient Total
Amodei, Mark (R-NV) $1,000
Barton, Joe (R-TX) $2,500
Bilirakis, Gus (R-FL) $4,500
Bishop, Mike (R-MI) $4,000
Brady, Kevin (R-TX) $10,000
Brown, Anthony (D-MD) $1,000
Buchanan, Vernon (R-FL) $1,000
Bustos, Cheri (D-IL) $2,500
Cardenas, Tony (D-CA) $2,000
Carter, Buddy (R-GA) $4,000
Clarke, Yvette D (D-NY) $7,500
Clyburn, James E (D-SC) $10,000
Cole, Tom (R-OK) $1,000
Collins, Chris (R-NY) $2,500
Comstock, Barbara (R-VA) $2,000
Costa, Jim (D-CA) $5,000
Costello, Ryan (R-PA) $1,000
Crowley, Joseph (D-NY) $2,500
Cuellar, Henry (D-TX) $1,000
Curbelo, Carlos (R-FL) $2,500
Curtis, John (R-UT) $1,000
Denham, Jeff (R-CA) $3,500
Dingell, Debbie (D-MI) $2,500
Donovan, Dan (R-NY) $1,000
Doyle, Mike (D-PA) $5,000
Duffy, Sean P (R-WI) $2,000
Faso, John (R-NY) $1,000
Frelinghuysen, Rodney (R-NJ) $2,000
Gallagher, Mike (R-WI) $2,000
Griffith, Morgan (R-VA) $5,000
Guthrie, Brett (R-KY) $2,000
Harper, Gregg (R-MS) $1,000
Higgins, Brian M (D-NY) $1,000
Hoyer, Steny H (D-MD) $10,000
Hudson, Richard (R-NC) $4,000
Hultgren, Randy (R-IL) $2,500
Hurd, Will (R-TX) $7,500
Johnson, Bill (R-OH) $5,000
Johnson, Mike (R-LA) $1,000
Kaptur, Marcy (D-OH) $2,500
Katko, John (R-NY) $4,000
Kennedy, Joe III (D-MA) $2,500
Kind, Ron (D-WI) $2,000
Kinzinger, Adam (R-IL) $4,500
LaHood, Darin (R-IL) $2,000
LaMalfa, Doug (R-CA) $1,000
Lance, Leonard (R-NJ) $4,000
Latta, Robert E (R-OH) $5,000
Lawrence, Brenda (D-MI) $2,500
Lesko, Debbie (R-AZ) $2,500
Loebsack, David (D-IA) $2,000
Long, Billy (R-MO) $1,000
Luetkemeyer, Blaine (R-MO) $5,000
Lujan, Ben Ray (D-NM) $7,500
MacArthur, Thomas (R-NJ) $2,000
Matsui, Doris O (D-CA) $3,000
McCarthy, Kevin (R-CA) $7,500
McHenry, Patrick (R-NC) $5,000
McKinley, David (R-WV) $3,500
McNerney, Jerry (D-CA) $3,500
Meehan, Patrick (R-PA) $2,000
Miller, Carol (R-WV) $1,000
Mullin, Markwayne (R-OK) $5,000
Neal, Richard E (D-MA) $5,000
Norcross, Don (D-NJ) $2,500
Nunes, Devin (R-CA) $2,000
O’Halleran, Tom (D-AZ) $1,000
Olson, Pete (R-TX) $4,500
Pallone, Frank Jr (D-NJ) $5,000
Panetta, Jimmy (D-CA) $1,000
Paulsen, Erik (R-MN) $4,000
Peters, Scott (D-CA) $5,000
Pocan, Mark (D-WI) $2,000
Ratcliffe, John Lee (R-TX) $1,000
Reed, Tom (R-NY) $6,500
Rice, Tom (R-SC) $4,500
Richmond, Cedric (D-LA) $5,000
Rodgers, Cathy McMorris (R-WA) $3,000
Roskam, Peter (R-IL) $5,000
Ruppersberger, Dutch (D-MD) $2,000
Rush, Bobby L (D-IL) $2,500
Scalise, Steve (R-LA) $7,500
Schrader, Kurt (D-OR) $1,000
Sewell, Terri A (D-AL) $1,000
Shimkus, John M (R-IL) $5,000
Shuster, Bill (R-PA) $2,500
Simpson, Mike (R-ID) $5,000
Smith, Jason (R-MO) $4,500
Stivers, Steve (R-OH) $6,000
Swalwell, Eric (D-CA) $2,000
Thompson, Bennie G (D-MS) $2,000
Thompson, Mike (D-CA) $2,000
Thornberry, Mac (R-TX) $1,000
Tiberi, Pat (R-OH) $2,500
Tonko, Paul (D-NY) $4,000
Upton, Fred (R-MI) $10,000
Valadao, David (R-CA) $2,000
Visclosky, Pete (D-IN) $4,000
Wagner, Ann L (R-MO) $1,000
Walberg, Tim (R-MI) $5,000
Walden, Greg (R-OR) $5,000
Walorski, Jackie (R-IN) $5,000
Walters, Mimi (R-CA) $2,000
Welch, Peter (D-VT) $1,000
Womack, Steve (R-AR) $2,000
Yoder, Kevin (R-KS) $1,000
Senate
Total to Democrats: $56,500
Total to Republicans: $44,500
Recipient Total
Baldwin, Tammy (D-WI) $2,500
Barrasso, John A (R-WY) $10,000
Blackburn, Marsha (R-TN) $4,500
Cardin, Ben (D-MD) $1,500
Carper, Tom (D-DE) $4,000
Casey, Bob (D-PA) $2,500
Donnelly, Joe (D-IN) $2,000
Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA) $4,000
Fischer, Deb (R-NE) $2,000
Flake, Jeff (R-AZ) $3,500
Hatch, Orrin G (R-UT) $4,000
Heinrich, Martin (D-NM) $6,000
Heitkamp, Heidi (D-ND) $7,000
Heller, Dean (R-NV) $2,500
Hyde-Smith, Cindy (R-MS) $5,000
Jones, Doug (D-AL) $2,500
Kaine, Tim (D-VA) $2,500
Manchin, Joe (D-WV) $5,000
McCaskill, Claire (D-MO) $1,000
McSally, Martha (R-AZ) $2,500
Menendez, Robert (D-NJ) $1,000
Messer, Luke (R-IN) $2,000
Murphy, Christopher S (D-CT) $4,000
Perdue, David (R-GA) $1,500
Peters, Gary (D-MI) $2,000
Shaheen, Jeanne (D-NH) $1,000
Sinema, Kyrsten (D-AZ) $2,000
Stabenow, Debbie (D-MI) $2,500
Strange, Luther (R-AL) $2,500
Sullivan, Dan (R-AK) $2,500
Tester, Jon (D-MT) $2,500
Whitehouse, Sheldon (D-RI) $1,000
Wicker, Roger (R-MS) $2,000

Edison Electric Institute



 

News

  • How to Fix Electric Grid Security
  • U.S. Continues to Import Large Transformers from China
  • 60 Minutes – How secure is America’s electric grid?
  • COVERUP UPDATE: CIP Violation Database and FOIA Lawsuit
  • Q: How Did We Become So Vulnerable?
  • Rate Recovery: How Electric Customers Fund Industry Lobbying
  • Energy Sector Supply Chain Review – U.S. Department of Energy
  • Criminally Negligent Homicide in February 2021 Texas Blackout Deaths?
  • Chinese Transformer Threat Now Confirmed by Two Administrations
  • Secretary of Energy Advisory Board: Comments of Michael Mabee
  • Electricity Advisory Committee: Comments of Michael Mabee
  • How the electric utility industry torpedoed grid security
  • Chinese Transformer Complaint Filed with U.S. Government
  • U.S. Electric Grid Imports More Chinese Transformers in 2020 and 2021
  • Recent Grid Threats: Frank Gaffney and Michael Mabee Break It Down
  • Secret Penalties: The Electric Grid Is Making You Pay Their Fines
  • Government Misses the Boat on Grid Security – Again
  • Critical Electric Infrastructure – The Government Must Step Up
  • FERC Dismisses Texas Grid Collapse Complaint
  • FERC Office of Public Participation: End the Electric Industry Coverup
  • Testimony of Michael Mabee on SB 1606 – All Hazards Grid Security
  • Federal Complaint Filed on Texas Grid Collapse
  • We Are Plugged In To Life Support
  • Texas Blackout: The Unacceptable Outcome of a Foreseeable Event
  • Chinese Transformers in the Electric Grid: Lights Out For NYC?
  • Message to Governor Jennifer Granholm and the Department of Energy
  • Chinese Transformers in the Electric Grid
  • The U.S. Has 300 Chinese Large Power Transformers
  • Senator Murkowski Questions Cybersecurity Order Suspension
  • Grid Supply Chain Cybersecurity Order “Suspended”

Fund The Fight!


Subjects

Search Website

Subscribe for Updates!

Follow me on Twitter

Tweets by CivilDefenseBK

Click To Get Prepared!

The Civil Defense Book: Emergency Preparedness for a Rural or Suburban Community
The Civil Defense Book Get it now!

Subscribe for updates

Follow Me On Facebook

The Civil Defense Book

7 months ago

The Civil Defense Book
Bradford Clark Freeman, the last surviving member of Easy Company's Band of Brothers, dies at 97apple.news/AkFt2MfXqTCWTe4KGOFDOPg ... See MoreSee Less

Bradford Clark Freeman, the last surviving member of Easy Company's Band of Brothers, dies at 97 — CNN

apple.news

Bradford Clark Freeman, believed to be the last surviving original member of the historic World War II parachute infantry regiment of the US Army known as Easy Company, died Sunday in Columbus, Missis...
View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

The Civil Defense Book

7 months ago

The Civil Defense Book
Here Comes the Sun—to End Civilizationwww.wired.com/story/sun-storm-end-civilization/ ... See MoreSee Less

Here Comes the Sun—to End Civilization

www.wired.com

Every so often, our star fires off a plasma bomb in a random direction. Our best hope the next time Earth is in the crosshairs? Capacitors.
View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

Fund The fight!


©2023 Grid Security Now! | Theme by SuperbThemes